Kimi-K3 README

The project's README from github.com/MoonshotAI/Kimi-K3. As one markdown file: README.md.

Kimi K3

Chat Homepage
Hugging Face Twitter Follow Discord ModelScope
License

📰  Tech Blog |     📄  Full Report

1. Model Introduction

Kimi K3 is an open-weight, native multimodal agentic model and our most capable model to date. It is a 2.8T-parameter model built on Kimi Delta Attention (KDA) and Attention Residuals (AttnRes), with native vision capabilities and a 1-million-token context window. It is the world's first open 3T-class model, designed for frontier intelligence across long-horizon coding, knowledge work, and reasoning.

Key Features

2. Model Summary

Architecture Mixture-of-Experts (MoE)
Total Parameters 2.8T
Activated Parameters 104B
Number of Layers 93
Number of Dense Layers 1
Attention-Layer Composition 69 KDA + 24 Gated MLA
Attention Hidden Dimension 7168
Number of Attention Heads 96
Latent MoE Dimension 3584
MoE Hidden Dimension (per Expert) 3072
Number of Experts 896
Selected Experts per Token 16
Number of Shared Experts 2
Vocabulary Size 160K
Context Length 1048576
Attention Mechanism KDA & Gated MLA
Activation Function SiTU-GLU
Vision Encoder MoonViT-V2
Parameters of Vision Encoder 401M
Quantization MXFP4 weights / MXFP8 activations
(quantization-aware training)
Modality Text, Image

3. Evaluation Results

Benchmark Kimi K3
(max)
Claude Fable 5
(max, w/ fallback)
GPT-5.6 Sol
(max)
Claude Opus 4.8
(max)
GPT-5.5
(xhigh)
GLM-5.2
(max)
Reasoning & Knowledge
GPQA Diamond 93.5 92.6 94.1 91.0 93.5 91.2
CritPt 23.4 28.6 32.3 20.9 27.1 20.9
AA-LCR 74.7 70.0 73.7 67.7 74.3 71.3
HLE-Full 43.5 / 56.0 53.3 / 63.0 44.5 / 58.0 49.8 / 57.9 41.4 / 52.2 —
Coding
DeepSWE 67.5 70.0 73.0 59.0 67.0 46.2
ProgramBench 77.8 76.8 77.6 71.9 70.8 63.7
Terminal-Bench 2.1 88.3 88.0 88.8 84.6 83.4 82.7
FrontierSWE 81.2 86.6 71.3 66.7 64.9 67.3
SWE-Marathon 42.0 35.0 39.0 40.0 14.0 13.0
PostTrainBench 36.6 41.4 34.6 34.1 28.4 34.3
MLS-Bench-Lite 48.3 49.9 46.2 42.8 35.5 40.4
SciCode 58.7 60.2 56.1 53.5 56.1 50.5
Kimi Code Bench 2.0 72.9 76.9 64.8 71.7 69.0 64.2
Agentic
BrowseComp 91.2 88.0 90.4 84.3 84.4 —
DeepSearchQA (F1) 95.0 94.2 — 93.1 — —
ResearchRubrics 76.2 — 73.8 73.5 64.0 71.1
GDPval-AA v2 (Elo) 1686 1747 1736 1593 1491 1510
Toolathlon-Verified 76.5 77.9 74.9 76.2 73.5 59.9
MCPMark-Verified 94.5 87.4 92.9 76.4 92.9 —
MCP-Atlas

Kimi-K3 (MoonshotAI/Kimi-K3)

Searching Database…

8.9K ·GitHub
What is this?Kimi K3 is MoonshotAI's open-weight, native multimodal agentic model — a 2.8T-parameter Mixture-of-Experts system built for frontier-level long-horizon coding, agentic knowledge work, and reasoning.
Is this a hosted chatbot I can just use, or something I have to run myself?It's a release of raw model weights, not a hosted product — you download and serve the weights yourself under the Kimi K3 License.
What hardware does running the full model actually require?Only 104B of the model's 2.8T total parameters are activated per token thanks to its sparse MoE design, and weights use MXFP4/MXFP8 quantization-aware training to shrink the footprint, but you still need multi-GPU infrastructure to serve a model this size.
How sparse is the model really — does it use all its experts at once?No, it only activates 16 of 896 experts per token via the Stable LatentMoE framework, which is what keeps the effective compute manageable despite the 2.8T parameter count.
What is Kimi Delta Attention (KDA)?KDA is the new attention mechanism underlying K3, used in 69 of its 93 layers alongside Gated MLA in the remaining layers, paired with Attention Residuals (AttnRes) to improve scaling efficiency.
How much better is K3 than its predecessor Kimi K2?MoonshotAI reports roughly a 2.5x improvement in overall scaling efficiency over Kimi K2, driven by the new Stable LatentMoE sparsity design.
Can it understand images and video, or just text?K3 is natively multimodal: it processes text, images, and video within the same model using a 401M-parameter MoonViT-V2 vision encoder, plus a 1-million-token context window.
How does it compare to Claude and GPT on coding benchmarks?On Terminal-Bench 2.1 it scores 88.3, ahead of Claude Opus 4.8 (84.6) and GPT-5.5 (83.4), and it leads on SWE-Marathon (42.0) among the compared frontier models.
Creator
MoonshotAI
Size
1.4 MB
Stars
8.9K
Updated
CommitAug 06
Age
2mo
Commits · 90 Days