Kimi-K2 README

The project's README from github.com/MoonshotAI/Kimi-K2. As one markdown file: README.md.

Kimi K2: Open Agentic Intelligence

Chat Homepage
Hugging Face Twitter Follow Discord
License

📰  Tech Blog     |     📄  Full Report

1. Model Introduction

Kimi K2 is a state-of-the-art mixture-of-experts (MoE) language model with 32 billion activated parameters and 1 trillion total parameters. Trained with the Muon optimizer, Kimi K2 achieves exceptional performance across frontier knowledge, reasoning, and coding tasks while being meticulously optimized for agentic capabilities.

Key Features

Model Variants

Evaluation Results

2. Model Summary

Architecture Mixture-of-Experts (MoE)
Total Parameters 1T
Activated Parameters 32B
Number of Layers (Dense layer included) 61
Number of Dense Layers 1
Attention Hidden Dimension 7168
MoE Hidden Dimension (per Expert) 2048
Number of Attention Heads 64
Number of Experts 384
Selected Experts per Token 8
Number of Shared Experts 1
Vocabulary Size 160K
Context Length 128K
Attention Mechanism MLA
Activation Function SwiGLU

3. Evaluation Results

Instruction model evaluation results

Benchmark Metric Kimi K2 Instruct DeepSeek-V3-0324 Qwen3-235B-A22B
(non-thinking)
Claude Sonnet 4
(w/o extended thinking)
Claude Opus 4
(w/o extended thinking)
GPT-4.1 Gemini 2.5 Flash
Preview (05-20)
Coding Tasks
LiveCodeBench v6
(Aug 24 - May 25)
Pass@1 53.7 46.9 37.0 48.5 47.4 44.7 44.7
OJBench Pass@1 27.1 24.0 11.3 15.3 19.6 19.5 19.5
MultiPL-E Pass@1 85.7 83.1 78.2 88.6 89.6 86.7 85.6
SWE-bench Verified
(Agentless Coding)
Single Patch w/o Test (Acc) 51.8 36.6 39.4 50.2 53.0 40.8 32.6
SWE-bench Verified
(Agentic Coding)
Single Attempt (Acc) 65.8 38.8 34.4 72.7* 72.5* 54.6 —
Multiple Attempts (Acc) 71.6 — — 80.2 79.4* — —
SWE-bench Multilingual
(Agentic Coding)
Single Attempt (Acc) 47.3 25.8 20.9 51.0 — 31.5 —
TerminalBench Inhouse Framework (Acc) 30.0 — — 35.5 43.2 8.3 —
Terminus (Acc) 25.0 16.3 6.6 — — 30.3 16.8
Aider-Polyglot Acc 60.0 55.1 61.8 56.4 70.7 52.4 44.0
Tool Use Tasks
Tau2 retail Avg@4 70.6 69.1 57.0 75.0 81.8 74.8 64.3
Tau2 airline Avg@4 56.5 39.0 26.5 55.5 60.0 54.5 42.5
Tau2 telecom Avg@4 65.8 32.5 22.1 45.2 57.0 38.6 16.9
AceBench Acc 76.5 72.7 70.5 76.2 75.6 80.1 74.5
Math & STEM Tasks
AIME 2024 Avg@64 69.6 59.4* 40.1* 43.4 48.2 46.5 61.3
AIME 2025 Avg@64 49.5 46.7 24.7* 33.1* 33.9* 37.0 46.6
MATH-500 Acc 97.4 94.0* 91.2* 94.0 94.4 92.4 95.4
HMMT 2025 Avg@32 38.8 27.5 11.9 15.9 15.9 19.4 34.7
CNMO 2024 Avg@16 74.3 74.7 48.6 60.4 57.6 56.6 75.0
PolyMath-en Avg@4 65.1 59.5 51.9 52.8 49.8 54.0 49.9
ZebraLogic Acc 89.0 84.0 37.7* 73.7 59.3 58.5 57.9
AutoLogi Acc 89.5 88.9 83.3 89.8 86.1 88.2 84.1
GPQA-Diamond Avg@8 75.1 68.4* 62.9* 70.0* 74.9* 66.3 68.2
SuperGPQA Acc 57.2 53.7 50.2 55.7 56.5 50.8 49.6
Humanity's Last Exam
(Text Only)
- 4.7 5.2 5.7 5.8 7.1 3.7 5.6
General Tasks
MMLU EM 89.5 89.4 87.0 91.5 92.9 90.4 90.1
MMLU-Redux EM 92.7 90.5 89.2 93.6 94.2 92.4 90.6
MMLU-Pro EM 81.1 81.2* 77.3 83.7 86.6 81.8 79.4
IFEval Prompt Strict 89.8 81.1 83.2* 87.6 87.4 88.0 84.3
Multi-Challenge Acc 54.1 31.4 34.0 46.8 49.0 36.4 39.5
SimpleQA Correct 31.0 27.7 13.2 15.9 22.8 42.3 23.3
Livebench Pass@1 76.4 72.4 67.6 74.8 74.6 69.8 67.8
• Bold denotes global SOTA, and underlined denotes open-source SOTA.
• Data points marked with * are directly from the model's tech report or blog.
• All metrics, except for SWE-bench Verified (Agentless), are evaluated with an 8k output token length. SWE-bench Verified (Agentless) is limited to a 16k output token length.
• Kimi K2 achieves 65.8% pass@1 on the SWE-bench Verified tests with bash/editor tools (single-attempt patches, no test-time compute). It also achieves a 47.3% pass@1 on the SWE-bench Multilingual tests under the same conditions. Additionally, we report results on SWE-bench Verified tests (71.6%) that leverage parallel test-time compute by sampling multiple sequences and selecting the single best via an internal scoring model.
• To ensure the stability of the evaluation, we employed avg@k on the AIME, HMMT, CNMO, PolyMath-en, GPQA-Diamond, EvalPlus, Tau2.
• Some data points have been omitted due to prohibitively expensive evaluation costs.

Base model evaluation results

Benchmark Metric Shot Kimi K2 Base Deepseek-V3-Base Qwen2.5-72B Llama 4 Maverick
General Tasks
MMLU EM 5-shot 87.8 87.1 86.1 84.9
MMLU-pro EM 5-shot 69.2 60.6 62.8 63.5
MMLU-redux-2.0 EM 5-shot 90.2 89.5 87.8 88.2
SimpleQA Correct 5-shot 35.3 26.5 10.3 23.7
TriviaQA EM 5-shot 85.1 84.1 76.0 79.3
GPQA-Diamond Avg@8 5-shot 48.1 50.5 40.8 49.4
SuperGPQA EM 5-shot 44.7 39.2 34.2 38.8
Coding Tasks
LiveCodeBench v6 Pass@1 1-shot 26.3 22.9 21.1 25.1
EvalPlus Pass@1 - 80.3 65.6 66.0 65.5
Mathematics Tasks
MATH EM 4-shot 70.2 60.1 61.0 63.0
GSM8k EM 8-shot 92.1 91.7 90.4 86.3
Chinese Tasks
C-Eval EM 5-shot 92.5 90.0 90.9 80.9
CSimpleQA Correct 5-shot 77.6 72.1 50.5 53.5
• We only evaluate open-source pretrained models in this work. We report results for Qwen2.5-72B because the base checkpoint for Qwen3-235B-A22B was not open-sourced at the time of our study.

Kimi-K2 (MoonshotAI/Kimi-K2)

Searching Database…

11.1K ·GitHub
What is this?Kimi K2 is a large language model series from Moonshot AI: a mixture-of-experts model with 1 trillion total parameters (32B activated per token), trained for frontier knowledge, reasoning, coding and especially agentic tool-use tasks.
Is this a single model or does it come in variants?There are two variants: Kimi-K2-Base, the raw pretrained foundation model for researchers who want to fine-tune, and Kimi-K2-Instruct, the post-trained chat/agentic model meant for drop-in use without long thinking.
Is Kimi-K2-Instruct a 'thinking' model like reasoning-focused competitors?No, it is described as a reflex-grade model without long thinking, unlike extended-thinking modes in some competitor models.
Who is this model aimed at?Researchers and developers who need either a base model to fine-tune or a ready-to-use chat/agent model for tool-use and coding tasks.
How does Kimi K2 compare to models like DeepSeek-V3 or Claude on coding benchmarks?On SWE-bench Verified agentic coding, Kimi K2 Instruct scores 65.8% pass@1 (single attempt), well above DeepSeek-V3-0324's 38.8% and Qwen3-235B's 34.4%, though below Claude Opus 4's 72.5%.
What optimizer was used to train such a huge model stably?Moonshot AI used the Muon optimizer at unprecedented scale, with a novel 'MuonClip' technique developed to resolve training instabilities while scaling to 1T parameters.
How large is the training data and context window?Kimi K2 was pretrained on 15.5 trillion tokens with zero training instability, and supports a 128K token context length.
How many experts does the MoE architecture use?It has 384 experts total, with 8 experts selected per token plus 1 shared expert, across 61 layers using MLA attention and SwiGLU activations.
Creator
MoonshotAI
Size
0.8 MB
Stars
11.1K
Updated
CommitOct 31
Age
1y
Commits · 90 Days