Self-evolution for any agent harness.
Plug in. Evolve. Measure.
Quick Start •
Harnesses •
How It Works •
The Episode Loop •
Onboard Your Harness •
Recipes •
Bring a Benchmark •
Add a Measurement •
v0.3.0 Notes •
Environments •
Measurement
Plug in any agent harness × any model, let it rewrite its own harness over many
context-fresh episodes, and measure how the harness changes — under a goal, many goals,
or no goal at all.
Named for the sea-god who changes shape at will: Proteus watches a harness reshape
itself, and gives you the ruler to measure the change.
🔭 Why Proteus is different
Agent self-improvement is moving from the weights to the harness — the prompts, memory,
skills, tools, and control loop the model runs on. Recent systems evolve a harness to raise
a benchmark score. Proteus asks a different, complementary question: what does a
self-evolving harness actually do, and does an initial condition leave a permanent mark?
Three things set it apart from every existing harness-evolution system:
- Harness-agnostic. Others evolve harnesses built from their own primitives. Proteus
evolves yours: implement one small
HarnessAdapter and your agent — the bundled
offline minimal harness (the CLI default), DeepSeek Harness, Pi, Aki, or your own —
plugs into the same framework, sandbox, and measurement.
- Goal and no-goal, with visible or hidden evaluators. Others hard-code a single
regime: one benchmark verifier, agent blind to the score, goal mandatory. Proteus spans
the space —
no-goal | one goal | many goals, and evaluators the agent either sees
(in context-fresh phases) or never sees. No-goal, unpressured evolution is a
first-class mode.
- A measurement instrument, not just a score. Others report task pass-rates. Proteus
ships the ruler for the harness itself: structural distance between harness states
(per surface, path length), a crystallization / swap test (remove the disposition,
read the harness back), and behavioural distance with a permutation test (the
action-preference statistic). Every condition is read with the same ruler.
🚀 60-second demo (no API key, no Docker)
pip install proteus-evolve # no model SDK; Python 3.10 adds only a TOML compatibility package
The bundled minimal harness runs fully offline, so you can see the whole pipeline before
wiring up a real agent:
proteus run --harness minimal \
--arm neutral --arm review:notes --arm review:tools \
--seeds 4 --episodes 8 --out runs/demo
proteus measure --harness minimal --out runs/demo
arm seeds notes tools (mean units built)
neutral 4 3.5 4.0
review_notes 4 13.0 0.0
review_tools 4 3.8 8.0
behavioural R (between/within arms, last episode): 3.075 p=0.0150
An installed action preference measurably shifts what the harness grows — and the same
measure reads a no-goal run and a goal run identically.
🧩 Harnesses in the box
| adapter |
what it is |
needs |
minimal |
offline reference harness (mock policy) |
nothing |
llm |
the same harness driven by a live model — any OpenAI-compatible endpoint, DeepSeek by default |
an API key |
dsh |
DeepSeek Harness, headless profile, in a prepared container |
Docker + a DeepSeek key |
pi |
Pi — Mario Zechner's minimal coding harness (4 tools, native AGENTS.md + skills) |
Docker + a DeepSeek key |
codex |
OpenAI Codex CLI — pinned, source-evolving Rust harness using native codex exec --json traces |
Docker + Codex auth/API key |
aki |
the Aki research harness (the paper's apparatus) |
the research checkout |
| yours |
--harness <module>:<Class> — no registration |
your adapter |
dsh, pi, and codex are the source-evolving third-party integrations. At seed time each
adapter extracts the pinned harness's real source into harness/src/. During episode N,
all four phases boot the same read-only last-valid snapshot while writing a separate
candidate. After reflect, Proteus rebuilds and validates the candidate; only a passing
candidate activates in episode N+1. A failed build is prevented from activating, while
its exact tree is restored as the next writable repair candidate; the next episode's
running harness remains healthy. The source is therefore a
measured, snapshotted loop surface alongside instructions, notes, tools, and skills. The
adapters still leave the upstream repositories untouched: they arrange the run copy,
launch one prepared container per phase, and parse the harness's own session logs.
🏗️ How it works
flowchart LR
U["Run config<br/>harness × model<br/>goal + evaluators<br/>arms + seeds"] --> F["Proteus framework<br/>assemble phase prompts"]
F --> A["HarnessAdapter<br/>run one episode"]
A --> H["harness/<br/>evolving, snapshotted subject"]
A --> T["task/<br/>optional benchmark workspace<br/>outside the snapshot"]
A --> L["native harness logs"]
L --> E["evaluators<br/>hidden or observe-visible"]
E --> S["selection + snapshot<br/>accept or preserve-and-restore"]
S --> F
Every seed runs N context-fresh episodes. Evolved harness files cross the episode
boundary; adapters that opt into framework continuity also receive a bounded operational
handoff stored outside the measured snapshot. By default, one episode is four phases:
observe → propose → act → reflect
- observe — take stock; if you configured a visible evaluator, its score on the last
episode is shown here.
- propose — list ways to improve your own harness.
- act — carry one out by editing the harness. The goal, if any, is announced in every
fresh phase so observation and planning stay aligned with it.
- reflect — decide what to keep.
The framework owns everything that is not the harness (prompts, goal text, evaluator
routing, snapshotting, selection, measurement). The adapter owns everything that is
(how the four phases actually execute). That split is what makes Proteus harness-agnostic.
The core objects
| Concept |
What it is |
HarnessAdapter |
the contract a harness implements: its surfaces, phase-continuity capability, how to run an episode, how to read the action trace, how to install/remove a disposition |
Surface |
one editable, persistent region (memory / skills / tools / code / …), declared as data so the measurement layer needs no hard-coded names |
Disposition |
the action-preference perturbation — a single, removable change at t=0 (prompt suffix, config value, or code patch) |
GoalConfig |
goal / no-goal / multi-goal, each evaluator HIDDEN or OBSERVE-visible, plus outer-loop selection (accept_reject) |
Sandbox |
where an episode runs; LocalSandbox (trusted) or DockerSandbox (OS-level isolation, tunable network) |
Action preference
An action preference is installed as a Disposition and is guaranteed removable, so the
crystallization test can take it away and read what the harness built on its own:
from proteus.core import review, record, NEUTRAL
review("memory") # each phase: review your memory, act or not
record("tools") # keep your tools current as you work
NEUTRAL # the control, F0 — no perturbation
Goals and evaluators
from proteus.core import EvaluatorSpec, GoalConfig, Visibility
GoalConfig.no_goal() # unpressured evolution
GoalConfig.of(text="Become more reliable.") # stated goal, no evaluator
GoalConfig.of(
text="Become more reliable.",
evaluators=(EvaluatorSpec("reliability", my_eval,
visibility=Visibility.OBSERVE),),
) # agent sees the score next episode
GoalConfig.of(text="Pursue A and B together.",
evaluators=(EvaluatorSpec("a", eval_a),
EvaluatorSpec("b", eval_b)),
selection="accept_reject") # outer loop rejects regressions
An evaluator is any callable (trace, ctx) -> EvalResult; bring a benchmark verifier, an
LLM judge, or one of the built-ins (proteus.core.evaluators).
Evaluator visibility, selection eligibility, and scheduling are independent. You can
evaluate H0, every N episodes, or explicit checkpoints while retaining dated feedback
across fresh contexts. See evaluator controls.
The default four-phase protocol can also be customized; DSH supports explicit
interrupted-phase recovery without refilling the tool budget. See episode controls.
Sandbox
from proteus.sandbox import SandboxConfig, DockerSandbox
DockerSandbox(SandboxConfig(network="none")) # no egress
DockerSandbox(SandboxConfig(network="host", # needs an LLM endpoint
env_passthrough=("OPENAI_API_KEY",),
mem_limit="4g"))
A self-editing agent writes and runs its own code, so an application-level file sandbox
cannot contain it — Proteus runs real harnesses in a container whose filesystem holds the
harness and nothing else.
🔌 Onboard your harness
The input is a repository — a git URL or local path:
proteus env scaffold --from https://github.com/org/their-harness --name theirs --ref v1.2.0
proteus env build theirs # pinned image, resolved sha recorded in the manifest
# write the adapter (7 methods), then:
proteus check --harness mypkg.theirs_adapter:TheirsHarness --episode
proteus run --harness mypkg.theirs_adapter:TheirsHarness --arm neutral ...
proteus check machine-verifies the contract (removable disposition via fingerprint
round-trip, snapshot-ability, trace shape). The full guide: docs/ADAPTERS.md.
To start from a working skeleton instead of a blank file,
python -m proteus.scaffold adapter MyHarness copies the fully-commented
proteus/examples/adapter_template.py — see
CONTRIBUTING.md. The templates ship on PyPI too; outside a Git checkout
the default output is the current directory (or choose an explicit --dest).
📦 Prepared environments
environments/ contains two environment shapes. Manifest-backed environments pair a
Dockerfile or prebuilt image with environment.toml; the built-in dsh-src/ and
pi-src/ images are instead built from pinned upstream source checkouts, because the image
must contain the exact source and toolchain that the adapter later extracts and rebuilds.
In both shapes evolving state lives in mounts, never in a per-run image. Conventions:
environments/README.md; design notes:
docs/ENVIRONMENTS.md.
📏 Measurement
from proteus.measure import distance, stream, crystallize
distance — structural distance per surface (added / dropped / revised), path length
(proteus measure --travel).stream — behavioural distance (frequency / order / procedure) and the between/within
permutation test R.crystallize — mount an evolved state under a neutral disposition and test whether it
reads back as its own endpoint (two-stage fidelity + arm-shift).
To add a per-episode measurement evaluator, a post-run statistic, or an adapter-native
counter, see docs/MEASUREMENTS.md. The guide covers their different
contracts, artifact boundaries, CLI/report integration, statistical rules, and tests.
📤 Outputs
Every run's primary artifact is its evolution history as a git repository — one commit
per episode. Keep it local, browse it, or push it wherever you like (never automatic):
proteus repo export runs/demo/runs/run-<id> my-evolution # normal repo, `git log` = the trajectory
proteus repo push runs/demo/runs/run-<id> [email protected]:you/my-evolution.git
Every sweep also ships a live tracking page — per-run progress, per-surface growth
curves, evaluator scores — updating while the sweep runs:
proteus watch --out runs/demo # http://localhost:8300/report.html
Tracking data (condition labels, hidden scores) lives at the sweep level, outside run
roots, so the evolving agent can never read its own condition.
📊 Status
v0.3.0 (research preview). Working today: the offline minimal harness; the live llm
harness; pinned, source-evolving DeepSeek Harness and Pi adapters with frozen per-episode
activation, automatic rollback, exact-tree boundary gates, rebuild caching, turn budgets,
phase-aware act-priority budget plans and agent-authored checkpoint tracking, and task
mounts; the Aki research adapter; local, Polyglot, and SWE-bench task integrations;
resume-safe sweeps; the full measurement,
audit, reliability, report, and repository-export paths; and adapter/environment tooling.
CI covers Python 3.10–3.14. The separate release-smoke workflow runs two episodes across
the public release set (minimal, llm, dsh, pi), exercises the benchmark path, and
requires both container harnesses to edit their own source and boot the edit; releases use
pinned upstream versions, while the weekly upstream canary is advisory. As a
cross-implementation check, Proteus's
behavioural ruler applied to the research runs independently reproduces their headline
dynamics: arms separate at episode 1 (R = 1.63) and converge by episode 30 (R = 0.93).
🤝 Contributing
The two highest-value contributions are a new harness adapter (evolve another agent
framework) and a new benchmark (measure under more goals). Both are single-file,
contract-checked, CI-gated additions:
python -m proteus.scaffold adapter MyHarness # skeleton -> proteus/adapters/myharness.py
python -m proteus.scaffold benchmark my_task # skeleton -> proteus/bench/my_task.py
proteus check --harness proteus.adapters.myharness:MyHarness --episode
The step-by-step guide (contract, templates, the conformance gate in
tests/test_conformance.py, PR expectations) is CONTRIBUTING.md.
Where help is wanted, in one line each — the full list with difficulty tags is
ROADMAP.md:
- More harnesses — Hermes Agent first (Python, built-in self-improvement surfaces),
then SWE-agent, OpenClaw, Codex CLI, OpenHands, OpenCode, Goose.
- More benchmarks — BigCodeBench-lite and a LiveCodeBench subset, SWE-bench
Lite/Verified wiring, and finishing sandboxed grading for
swe (HumanEval and MBPP
are shipped).
- Analysis —
proteus compare for side-by-side arms/runs; an episode-atlas view.
- Reproducibility & cost — per-episode token/cost accounting; one-command reproduce.
📖 Citation
See CITATION.cff. A paper reference will be added when the preprint is
public.
License
MIT.
Proteus 让你把任意代理运行框架接到任意模型上，让它在大量上下文全新（context-fresh）的 episode 中重写自身的运行框架（提示词、记忆、技能、工具、控制循环），并测量该框架随时间的实际变化。