pd-bridge README

The project's README from github.com/chadhurley25075-png/pd-bridge. As one markdown file: README.md.

pd-bridge — heterogeneous prefill/decode for DeepSeek-V4-Flash

License: Apache-2.0 status: reference implementation model: DeepSeek-V4-Flash prefill: vLLM / CUDA decode: oMLX / Metal

Prefill a 284B model on NVIDIA. Decode it on Apple Silicon. Over plain 10GbE.

How the bridge works

Two production inference engines that share no cache format, no framework, no vendor and no quantization, serving one request together. DeepSeek-V4-Flash is 284B total / 13B active, 256 routed experts, MLA + sparse attention, 149 GB resident on the prefill side and 156 GB on the decode side:

cold prompt        Mac Studio alone    Sparks prefill -> Mac decode
   ~25K tokens          42.6 s               28.2 s     1.5x
   ~82K tokens         205.8 s               72.9 s     2.8x
  ~105K tokens         245.6 s               75.5 s     3.3x
  ~241K tokens         732.3 s              200.3 s     3.7x
decode rate unchanged (23-25 tok/s both ways); warm turns bypass the bridge (4.9 s / 19.3 s at 241K)

Every row verdict-checked, 2026-09-06. The bridged leg scores 5/5 on the judged quality eval, same as native.

Since then the served window went 262,144 -> 2,097,152 and the ceiling moved with it. A 700,630-token cold prompt now bridges end to end in 11 minutes 26 seconds — verdict complete, 342 blocks, 1,117 tok/s of prefill. That is 2.9x past the largest prompt in the table above, and the pair has accepted over a million.

cold prompt     engine   tok/s    end-to-end   blocks   verdict
   192,099      119.2 s   1,611      143.1 s      93    complete
   385,838      288.7 s   1,337      466.6 s     188    complete
   677,069      596.8 s   1,134      655.9 s     330    complete
   700,630      627.0 s   1,117      685.5 s     342    complete
   709,055      635.4 s   1,116      694.6 s     345    partial 706,560/709,055 (99.6%)
   988,487    1,037.8 s     952    1,142.5 s     376    partial 770,048/988,487 (78%)
 1,006,172    1,070.5 s     940    1,171.7 s     346    partial 708,608/1,006,172 (70%)

All 2026-09-08, one prefill pair, same 10GbE. partial is not a failure: past roughly 772K tokens the capture crosses the prefill box's free-memory floor and seals a valid contiguous prefix instead of dying; the decoder mounts what arrived and natively prefills the remainder. See Known limits.

We have not run a Mac-alone control at these sizes, so those rows carry no ratio — they are what the bridge does, not a claimed speedup. The measured ratios stop at 241K and are shown above.

Full numbers and methodology: RESULTS.md · bench/BENCHMARK-PROTOCOL.md

2026-09-17 — the link is no longer plain 10GbE. A Mac Studio joined the Sparks' RoCE fabric through a MikroTik switch (ConnectX-4 Lx in a Thunderbolt enclosure, driven by Ash Hart's MCDMA), and a second Studio receives the same blocks over Apple's Thunderbolt RDMA. The cache now moves Spark → door Studio → library Studio → back as RDMA on every hop, and a four-turn conversation answered from the library in 7–10 s vs 30 s on one Studio and 18 s on the Sparks alone. That layer, its tools and its numbers live in fabric/. None of it exists without MCDMA; Ben's MelonDMA told us what the Gen3 tunnel would do before we had one.


The idea

Prefill/decode disaggregation is well established, and so is the hardware argument for it: prefill is compute-bound, decode is memory-bandwidth-bound, so run each phase where it is cheapest. Existing systems do this by transferring the KV cache from the prefill worker to the decode worker.

That requires both ends to agree on a cache format. Ours never can. One side is CUDA/vLLM with an FP8 paged cache; the other is Metal/MLX with its own block layout. Worse, DeepSeek-V4-Flash does not have "a KV cache" — each layer carries a rotating 128-token window, a compressor pool (ratio 4 with overlap carry, and ratio 128), and an indexer pool, all with layer-dependent RoPE.

So we don't transfer a cache. We compute the decoder's finished cache on the prefill machine, using the decoder's own weights, and write it straight into the decoder's prefix-cache store.

The prefill engine already computes the exact tensor those pools are a pure function of — the attention input. A hook takes it there, applies the Mac's projection and pooling math on the GPU, and emits the finished pools. The decode side assembles them into MLX cache objects and hands them to oMLX's own block writer. oMLX then sees a normal prefix-cache hit and only decodes. Neither engine is modified in its hot path; the decoder does not know a bridge exists.

Payload: ~10 KB per token — 0.80 GB for an 81K-token prompt, pulled in 1.08 s. The network stopped being the bottleneck; the prefill engine is now 65% of wall time, which is where you want it.

Why the reconstruction is trustworthy

The whole design rests on the pooled tensors being the same tensors the decoder would have computed. That is tested, not assumed:

check result
Cache arrays rebuilt on the Mac vs. a full native forward 313/313 bit-exact
Blocks written by the bridge vs. blocks oMLX writes itself 11/11 identical (only the created_at stamp differs)
Torch pooling port vs. MLX ground truth (T=23,217) projections, window, carries bit-exact; pooled tensors 99.95–99.96% identical, worst delta one bf16 ulp
In-container hook selftest (chunked == one-shot) 52/52
Needle retrieval through a fully reconstructed 81K cache correct on every benchmark run

studio/verify_blocks.py, studio/pd_diff_state.py, spark/pd_pool_validate.py and spark/pd_pool_selftest.py reproduce these. Compare tensors, never file hashes — created_at means a bridge-written block can never be byte-identical as a file.


Known limits — read this before you run it

The memory floor, and why big prompts come back partial (2026-09-08)

The capture lives in the prefill box's memory for the whole request and costs about 11.8 KB of unified memory per token on rank 0 only (rank 1 stays flat — it does its half of the attention and holds no capture). A GB10 has ONE 121 GB pool shared by weights, the vLLM KV arena and everything else, so steady-state free memory with the model up is ~22 GB.

Measured: the capture crosses a 5.0 GB free-memory floor at roughly 772,000 tokens. Past that the hook seals a valid contiguous prefix [0,T) and reports it rather than dying — the decoder mounts what arrived and natively prefills the tail. That is the partial verdict in the table above. A 700,630-token wake cleared the floor with 100 MB to spare; a 1,006,172-token wake sealed at 70%.

This replaced a real failure. Before the fix, _finish() copied every layer to the host without freeing the layers it had already written, so the full device capture and the growing host copies were alive at once. At 1,021,199 tokens it died after 11 of 43 layers and drove the box into swap thrash — no sshd even over a 200G fabric. It needed a physical power button. The hook now releases each layer as its file lands and checks MemAvailable every 64 layer-chunks.

If you are memory-tight, this is your limit, not the window. The window is a config number; the floor is physics on your box. Measure MemAvailable during a long prefill before trusting either.

The ~82K-token ceiling was a real bug. It is fixed. (History kept because the failure mode is instructive and the arithmetic still matters on smaller machines.)

omlx_block_writer used to hold one materialised cumulative cache snapshot per 2048-token boundary until finalize(): peak memory grew quadratically with prompt length (~`N(N+1)/2` blocks' worth of arrays — ~16 GB at 39 boundaries, ~23 GB at 47, which exhausted a 256 GB M3 Ultra holding a 156 GB model and wrote zero blocks at 97,848 tokens).

The writer now streams: each boundary is stored through oMLX's own pipeline and released the moment it is snapshotted (begin_stream/store_boundary; finalize drains and verifies). Peak memory is ONE boundary snapshot (~20 MB × boundary index / N — tens of MB, not tens of GB). It is validated against a real oMLX reference block (synthetic layout match) and live at 52 boundaries / 109,085 tokens — see RESULTS.md. PD_STREAM_BOUNDARIES=0 restores the batched path for comparison.

PD_MAX_BRIDGE_TOKENS remains as a configurable envelope guard, not a bug workaround: raise it to your machine's measured headroom.

Two related behaviours worth knowing:

Status, honestly

This is a reference implementation, not a library. It is pinned hard and it is young.

The transferable idea is bigger than this code: when two engines cannot share a cache format, compute the consumer's finished cache on the producer, using the consumer's weights. That generalizes past this model and this hardware, and it is the part worth stealing.


Layout

spark/    prefill side (NVIDIA / vLLM)
  capture_sitecustomize_v3.py   the hook: projections + pooling on the GPU, per-layer safetensors
  pd_pool_torch.py              torch port of the decoder's pooling math (RoPE, compress, rmsnorm)
  pd_pool_selftest.py           in-container selftest (chunked == one-shot)
  pd_pool_validate.py           validate the port against MLX ground truth
  pd-launch-v3.sh               launch vLLM with the hook (PD_HOOK=off for a control run)
  pd_capture_http.py            Range-capable server so the decoder can stream captures
  pd_share.py                   the threaded share the pooled path actually runs (SimpleHTTP drops connections under poll+fetch)
  pd-hf-layout.sh               lay the checkpoint out as an HF hub dir inside the container mount
  POOL-VALIDATION.md            what the validation numbers mean

studio/   decode side (Apple Silicon / oMLX)
  pd_front.py                   OpenAI-compatible front door; orchestrates a request end to end
  omlx_block_writer.py          drive oMLX's own store pipeline to emit prefix-cache blocks
  pd_assemble_blocks.py         build MLX cache objects from a pooled capture, snapshot per boundary
  pd_export_proj_weights.py     export the MLX projection weights the prefill hook needs
  pd_export_pool_truth.py       MLX-computed ground truth for validating the torch port
  pd_make_v3_from_mlx.py        build a v3 capture entirely in MLX (acceptance harness)
  pd_capture_mlx.py             capture attention inputs natively (test fixture)
  pd_rebuild_mlx.py             attention-only replay (the v1 path, kept for comparison)
  verify_blocks.py              directory-vs-directory block comparison
  pd_diff_state.py              cache-array diff against a full forward
  test_block_writer_synthetic.py
  pd_omlx_hooks.py              kv/RDMA path: staged restore, tail install, restore timing (PD_OMLX_HOOKS=1)
  pd-front-kv.sh / pd-rdma-recvd.sh   front door in kv mode / the RDMA receiver
  pd_assemble_kv.py, pd_verify_kv.py, test_omlx_block.py   kv-path assembly, bridged-vs-native check, block header gate

spark/ (kv/RDMA path)
  pd_kv_connector.py            vLLM v1 KV connector: oMLX-native blocks built on the GPU, pushed over RDMA during prefill
  pd_omlx_block.py              oMLX chain hashes + block file header
  pd-launch-kv.sh, pd_memguard.sh, pd-rdma-serve.sh, test_kv_gather.py

rdma/     pd_rdma (receiver, R1 pull server/client) + libpd_rdma_tx.so (the connector's sender); docs/RDMA.md

bench/    bench_cold.py (records the X-PD-Bridge verdict), hetero (the one-command demo client),
          BENCHMARK-PROTOCOL.md
docs/     DESIGN-v3-pooled.md — the pooling math and the hook points, derived from oMLX's own code
          FINDING-bench4-cold-fallback.md — the mid-request-flush autopsy; what broke and what it taught
          FINDING-flush-signal-three-watchers.md — why the flush signal was consumed by the wrong worker
          FINDING-stale-limits-after-a-window-change.md — READ THIS BEFORE RAISING YOUR WINDOW.
              Five numbers sized against the old window that break silently after you raise it,
              including the one that clamps every long-context answer to a single token.

Don't have this hardware? Start on the rung you can reach

Everything in this repo is written against the exact machines we ran, on purpose: if you have the same gear you get an exact replica and the numbers in RESULTS.md. If you don't, the idea is the same and the recipe scales down. Three rungs, honestly labeled:

rung prefill side decode side model status
A · exact replica 2× DGX Spark, TP2 over their direct 200G cable Mac Studio M3 Ultra 256 GB DeepSeek-V4-Flash (284B / 13B active) measured — everything in RESULTS.md
B · one Spark + any Apple Silicon Mac 1× DGX Spark (128 GB) Mac Studio / Mac mini / iMac with ≥32 GB unified memory a model that fits both boxes: the FP8 V4-Flash does not fit one Spark, so pick an MLA-latent model that does — DeepSeek-V2-Lite (16B) is the obvious first recipe only, unmeasured
C · the kid's stack one used CUDA gaming card (8–24 GB) in a beat PC, vLLM or sglang an M-series iMac / MacBook with 16 GB the smallest MLA-latent model that fits both recipe only, unmeasured

What is identical across all three rungs: the front door, the verdict header, the cold/warm decision, the block writer path, the benchmark protocol, the wire (ordinary Ethernet — ~10 KB/token means even 1 GbE moves a 30K-token prompt in ~0.3 s). What changes when you move down: the model, and therefore the pooling math in the capture hook (DeepSeek-V4-Flash's hook is specific to its sparse attention; a plain-MLA model like V2-Lite is simpler — its per-layer cache is the K/V rows themselves). docs/PORTING.md names the four seams you touch and has a two-question feasibility test that takes ten minutes.

What to expect at the bottom rung, honestly: the win is the ratio of prefill speeds. A used 3090 prefills a 16B MLA model far faster than a 16 GB Mac does, so the shape of the result should hold; the absolute numbers will be smaller because the prompts and models are smaller. We have not run rungs B or C ourselves. They are the first ports we want to see, a negative result is a result, and we will feature whoever lands one. Open an issue.

The point of this repo is that the privilege travels down. Take it apart.

Running it

Prerequisites

side hardware software model
prefill 2× NVIDIA DGX Spark (GB10, 128 GB each) on a 200G RoCE link (TP2) Docker + the sparkrun vLLM image with the DeepSeek-V4 plugin (aidendle94/sparkrun-vllm-ds4-gb10:production-ready, vLLM 0.21.1rc1) deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Flash (official FP8 checkpoint, ~149 GB)
decode 1× Mac Studio M3 Ultra, 256 GB oMLX 0.6.4 in a venv + the one-file patch in studio/ an MLX MXFP4-experts / MXFP8-attention conversion of deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 (~156 GB; any bit-exact conversion works — ours keeps the DSpark MTP heads)
link any Ethernet ≥10 GbE between the two SSH key from the Mac to the prefill head; Python 3.10+ on both —

The official FP8 checkpoint is ~149 GB, so it does not fit one 128 GB Spark: prefill is tensor-parallel across two Sparks over their direct ConnectX-7 link (the standard two-Spark cable — box to box, no switch involved). The only traffic that crosses to the Mac is HTTP over ordinary Ethernet, through whatever switch you have. The numbers in RESULTS.md are TP2 over a 10 GbE LAN.

The Mac-side model. We run a local, bit-exact MLX conversion of deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 (MXFP4 experts, MXFP8 attention, DSpark MTP heads kept). There is no single published id to point at, so produce your own; the closest one-liner is

mlx_lm.convert --hf-path deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4-Flash-0731 --mlx-path ~/models/DV4-Flash-MXFP4-MLX \
  -q --q-mode mxfp4 --q-bits 4 --q-group-size 32

(unverified by us end to end — our build was a mixed conversion). What matters for the bridge is self-consistency, not which conversion: make weights exports the attention-projection weights from your MLX model, and the prefill hook uses exactly those, so the pooled tensors match whatever the decoder actually runs.

cp config.example.env config.env && $EDITOR config.env   # nothing has a working default
source config.env

1. Export the decoder's projection weights (on the Mac, in the oMLX venv). These are what the prefill hook uses, so that the pooled tensors match the decoder's arithmetic rather than the prefill engine's:

$OMLX_PYTHON studio/pd_export_proj_weights.py --model "$PD_MODEL" --out "$PD_V3"

Copy $PD_V3 (pd_pool_torch.py, dv4_proj_weights.*, capture_sitecustomize_v3.py) to both prefill nodes.

2. Start the prefill pair (rank 0 = TP head, rank 1 = worker):

./spark/pd-launch-v3.sh 1     # worker first
./spark/pd-launch-v3.sh 0     # then head
python3 spark/pd_share.py "$PD_CAPTURE_DIR" 8010        # pooled mode (the one the numbers use)
# or: python3 spark/pd_capture_http.py --root "$PD_CAPTURE_DIR" --port 8010   # Range-capable; needed by the older 'hidden' pipelined mode

3. Patch and start oMLX, then the front door (on the Mac):

# oMLX must notice blocks written after model load — one small patch, applied once, in the oMLX venv:
OMLX_PKG=$($OMLX_PYTHON -c 'import omlx,os;print(os.path.dirname(omlx.__file__))')   # .../site-packages/omlx
patch -p0 -d "$OMLX_PKG/cache" < "$OLDPWD/studio/omlx-0.6.4-paged_ssd_cache-disk-index-fallback.patch"
# then (re)start oMLX serving $PD_MODEL on :8011, and start the front door:
$OMLX_PYTHON studio/pd_front.py          # listens on $PD_PORT (8012), OpenAI-compatible
curl -s localhost:8012/health             # {"ok": true, "front": "pd", ...}

Point any OpenAI-compatible client at :8012. Prompts under PD_MIN_TOKENS or with fewer than PD_MIN_TAIL uncached tokens go straight to oMLX; longer cold prompts are prefilled on the Sparks. The X-PD-Bridge response header says which happened. make doctor checks every link in the chain.

4. Benchmark:

python3 bench/bench_cold.py --chars 330000 --seed 301 --url http://<decoder>:8012   # bridged
python3 bench/bench_cold.py --chars 330000 --seed 302 --url http://<decoder>:8011   # native

Plain-attention models over RDMA

A dense GQA model (Qwen3, Llama, Mistral, …) needs no pooling port: its decoder cache is the prefill engine's own K/V rows. PD_MODE=kv uses an official vLLM KV connector to cut those rows into oMLX-native block files on the GPU, pushes them over RoCEv2 while the prefill runs, and hands oMLX a staged cache plus the tail rows, so the decoder prefills one token. Reference: Qwen3-32B bf16, one DGX Spark → Mac Studio M2 Ultra (Mac NIC via MelonDMA) — TTFT 43.9 s at 33K tokens with the engine at 42.6 s, ~4.4× the native oMLX rate measured at ~32K. Setup, porting checklist and verification: docs/RDMA.md.

Gotchas that cost us hours

The bridge was fluent and WRONG above the native window for days (2026-09-08)

This is the most important thing in this file if you are raising the context window.

The capture hook builds the decoder's rope table from its own projection sidecar (pd_v3/dv4_proj_weights.json). When we grew the served window 1M -> 2M we updated the engine flags and the per-node model config.json, but not the sidecar. It kept YaRN factor 16 / max_position 1,048,576 while the decoder ran factor 32 / 2,097,152.

YaRN is numerically identical below original_max_position_embeddings (65,536) and diverges above it. So every test at or under ~65K passed, and everything above it was quietly corrupt — verdict complete, position_gaps False, manifest T matching the request, and the model unable to retrieve a midpoint needle. Measured before the fix: MISS at 98,779 / 148,134 / 189,031 / 287,842 / 385,838 — five for five. After correcting the factor: PASS at 189K, at 200K on a cold cache, and at 386K.

The window lives in FOUR places. All of them must agree:

  1. the launch parameters (PD_MAX_MODEL_LEN, PD_ROPE_FACTOR)
  2. each prefill node's model config.json rope_scaling
  3. pd_v3/dv4_proj_weights.json rope_scaling + max_position_embeddings — the one we missed
  4. the decoder's config.json

LAW: a window change is not done until a needle is retrieved THROUGH THE BRIDGE above the native window. Our previously published "verified ceiling" had been measured on the native fallback path (the capture share happened to be down that day), so the bridged path's correctness at depth had never actually been tested.

Two traps that produce false verdicts:

And one in the harness itself: needle.py --max-tokens defaulted to 48. When the model spends that budget reasoning, content comes back empty and the harness scores a MISS. A 120K run "failed" at 48 and passed at 300 on the same document. Default raised to 300.

Contributing

The most useful things anyone could add, roughly in order:

  1. Kill the quadratic snapshot memory — done 2026-09-06 (streaming boundary store; see Known limits and RESULTS.md). The bridge is validated to 109K tokens on a 256 GB machine.
  2. A second model. The bridge shape should generalize to any MLA/sparse-attention model whose caches are a pure function of the attention input. Porting the pooling math is the work.
  3. Stream the capture over a socket instead of staging it on the prefill node's NVMe.
  4. Ship the decoder's carry state to the prefill engine so warm-but-extended prompts can prefill only the tail instead of the whole thing.
  5. Finish the judged quality eval on the bridged leg (bench/BENCHMARK-PROTOCOL.md).
  6. Make the engine patches survive upstream. Both would be better as small upstream hooks than as monkey patches — a cache-rescan API on the oMLX side especially.

Benchmark numbers in a PR must follow bench/BENCHMARK-PROTOCOL.md, including a native baseline on the same hardware and a warm engine on both legs.

Credits

oMLX for the decoder and its cache format; the vLLM DeepSeek-V4 plugin and the sparkrun GB10 image; EXO Labs, whose DGX Spark + Mac Studio prefill/decode result set the reference point this builds on; and the Spark↔Mac USB4/RDMA work that made joining the two silicon families look worth trying.

Apache-2.0.

pd-bridge (chadhurley25075-png/pd-bridge)

Searching Database…

Что это такое?pd-bridge обслуживает один запрос DeepSeek-V4-Flash на двух машинах: префилл выполняется на NVIDIA DGX Spark (CUDA/vLLM), декодирование — на Mac Studio (Metal/oMLX), а связаны они обычным Ethernet на 10 Гбит/с.
Это библиотека, которую можно установить, или система, которую нужно развернуть?Ни приложение, ни библиотека для импорта: это референсная реализация, которую вы разворачиваете на конкретной паре железа. Она подменяет внутренности vLLM и oMLX через monkey-patch, не изменяя их горячие пути кода.
Какое железо мне нужно, чтобы это запустить?Замеренная конфигурация — это 2x NVIDIA DGX Spark (GB10) на стороне префилла и Mac Studio M3 Ultra 256 ГБ на стороне декодирования, соединённые обычным Ethernet на 10 Гбит/с. Более дешёвые варианты существуют пока только на бумаге: один Spark плюс любой Mac на Apple Silicon с 32 ГБ памяти и больше, либо б/у CUDA-карта на 8–24 ГБ плюс Mac на M-серии с 16 ГБ.
Какое программное обеспечение работает на каждой стороне?Закреплённые версии стека: на Sparks работает vLLM 0.21.1rc1 с плагином DeepSeek-V4 (образ sparkrun), на Mac — oMLX 0.6.4. Самому мосту ничего особенного не нужно — достаточно Ethernet, ни RDMA, ни Thunderbolt не требуются.
Промпт какой длины он сможет переварить?Обслуживаемое окно выросло с 262,144 до 2,097,152 токенов, но реальный потолок — память: захват занимает примерно 11.8 КБ на токен на Spark, и где-то после 772,000 токенов мост фиксирует корректный частичный префикс, который Mac дорабатывает префиллом нативно.
Зачем вообще разносить префилл и декодирование по разным машинам?Префилл упирается в вычисления, а декодирование — в пропускную способность памяти, поэтому каждый этап выполняется там, где он дешевле. Обычно для этого пришлось бы передавать KV-кэш между машинами, но эти два движка никогда не согласуют общий формат кэша — поэтому мост вычисляет готовый кэш для Mac на Spark, используя веса самой Mac.
Если движки не могут использовать общий формат кэша, то как тогда работа реально передаётся?Кэш вообще не передаётся. Хук на Spark захватывает входные данные внимания, применяет математику проекций и пулинга от Mac прямо на GPU префилла и записывает готовые пулы сразу в хранилище префикс-кэша декодера. oMLX затем видит обычное попадание в префикс-кэш и занимается только декодированием; горячий путь ни одного из движков не изменяется.
Ответ через мост получается таким же качественным, как при нативном запуске модели?На оцениваемом тесте качества мостовой этап получает 5/5 — столько же, сколько и нативный запуск, хотя вывод не совпадает токен в токен, поскольку префилл работает на весах FP8, а декодирование — MXFP4. Корректность восстановления не предполагается, а проверяется: восстановленные массивы кэша совпали с полным нативным прогоном бит в бит в 313/313 случаях, и поиск иголки через восстановленный кэш на 81K был успешным в каждом запуске.
Насколько это быстро на практике?Холодный промпт на 700,630 токенов прошёл через мост от начала до конца за 11 минут 26 секунд при скорости префилла 1,117 токенов/с. Полезная нагрузка — около 10 КБ на токен: промпт на 81K токенов передал 0.80 ГБ за 1.08 с, так что сеть перестала быть узким местом; даже по 1 Гбит/с Ethernet промпт на 30K токенов передаётся примерно за 0.3 с.
Каждый ли запрос получит это ускорение?Нет — мост используется только для холодных длинных промптов; тёплые ходы диалога обходят его по задумке, и декодер обслуживает их нативно. А если мост где-то даст сбой, ответ всё равно вернётся корректным через нативный fallback, а заголовок X-PD-Bridge с вердиктом подскажет, каким путём он был обработан.
Size
0.4 MB
Stars
151
Updated
CommitOct 08
Age
1mo
Commits · 90 Days