wikiskill README

The project's README from github.com/ashutoshsinghpr7/wikiskill. As one markdown file: README.md.

🧠 WikiSkill

Compile agent experience into a persistent wiki — and let skills evolve themselves.

📚 Docs site: ashutoshsinghpr7.github.io/wikiskill · arXiv: 2608.27454

A faithful, production-minded implementation of WikiSkill: Compiling Agent Experience into Persistent Knowledge for Skill Evolution (arXiv:2608.27454, Google Research). The loop is agent-agnostic — Hermes Agent is the reference backend (built natively), Claude Code, Codex and GitHub Copilot CLI ship in the box, and OpenCode is on the roadmap (issue #13). Your agent becomes both the student and the teacher.

Python License: MIT PyPI CI arXiv


What this is

Agents fail. They also learn — but the lessons usually die with the session. WikiSkill fixes that by keeping a persistent knowledge wiki alongside the skill set, and running a closed evolution loop:

  1. The agent runs training tasks with its current skills → raw execution traces
  2. A Wiki Maintainer agent distills the traces into pattern pages (root causes, fixes)
  3. A Skill Proposer agent reads the wiki + traces and proposes one skill change (create or patch)
  4. Gating: the change is validated on held-out tasks — strictly better than the best score so far → kept; otherwise rolled back. The wiki is never rolled back.

Over iterations, knowledge compounds in the wiki while only proven improvements touch the skills.

                ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
                │              EVOLUTION LOOP (Algorithm 1)            │
                │                                                      │
   tasks ─────► │  Inference Agent ──► raw/traces/ (immutable)         │
                │        │                                            │
                │        ▼                                            │
                │  Wiki Maintainer ──► wiki/patterns/, index, log     │
                │        │                                            │
                │        ▼                                            │
                │  Skill Proposer ──► proposal (create/patch skill)   │
                │        │                                            │
                │        ▼                                            │
                │  GATE: val score > R_best? ──yes──► keep, R_best=R  │
                │        │ no                                         │
                │        ▼                                            │
                │  rollback skills; wiki retained forever             │
                └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Why Hermes?

This is not a toy simulator. Every component is a real Hermes agent turn:

WikiSkill (paper) This repo
Inference Agent hermes chat --oneshot in an isolated HERMES_HOME profile
Raw Layer Full session JSONL transcripts, exported via hermes sessions export
Wiki Layer wiki/ — git-tracked, maintained by a real agent, never rolled back
Skill Layer Real SKILL.md packages (frontmatter + instructions), git-managed
Wiki Maintainer Agent turn with the paper's Appendix E.2 prompt (extracted verbatim)
Skill Proposer Agent turn with the paper's Appendix E.3 ReAct prompt
Gating Strict R_val > R_best; git reset --hard on reject

Why the isolated profile matters: gating is only meaningful if the agent sees exactly the candidate skill set. Each evolution workspace gets its own HERMES_HOME (bundled skills opted out, empty memory, skills symlinked per stage) — your real profile is never touched.

Quickstart (60 seconds)

pip install wikiskill        # from PyPI (wheel + sdist, Python ≥3.10)
wikiskill init demo           # workspace + 22-task auto-graded bench (13 train / 9 val)
wikiskill status
wikiskill evolve --iters 3    # full Algorithm 1 loop with your default model

Or from source: pip install -e . (installs the same wikiskill CLI).

That's it. Each evolution workspace lives at workspaces/<domain>/:

workspaces/demo/
├── raw/traces/iter-01/{train,val}/<task>.jsonl   # immutable execution traces
├── wiki/                                          # persistent knowledge (never rolled back)
│   ├── index.md  ·  log.md  ·  skill-impact.md  ·  patterns/*.md
├── skills/active/                                 # git-managed evolving skill set (S₀ = ∅)
├── skills/framework/                              # maintainer + proposer agent skills
├── bench/tasks/<id>/                              # task sandboxes (inputs + grader)
└── runs/                                          # per-run stdout, proposals, state

CLI

Command What it does
wikiskill init <domain> [--backend claude] Create workspace + demo bench (pins the agent backend)
wikiskill bench --reset Regenerate tasks (deterministic, seed=42)
wikiskill status Workspace state: scores, skills, wiki, history
wikiskill evolve --iters N [--model M] [--provider P] [--max-turns N] [--no-early-stop] The full loop (--model/--provider patch the isolated profile's default model, e.g. google/gemini-2.5-flash-lite + openrouter)
wikiskill run-task <id> Single inference rollout (debug)
wikiskill compare <wsA> <wsB> [--iters N] Paired statistical comparison: per-task win/loss/tie + two-sided exact-binomial p-value (answers "did the skill actually help?" — see docs/COMPARING.md)

Bring your own tasks

Tasks are plain JSON (tasks.json); anything auto-gradable works:

{
  "id": "spec-format1-1", "split": "train",
  "title": "Format products according to spec",
  "prompt": "Read spec.md and products.json...",
  "sandbox": {"spec.md": "...", "products.json": "..."},
  "grader": {"type": "exact", "file": "output.txt", "expected": "alpha|35|active\n..."}
}

Graders: exact, contains, json_field, code_stdout (runs the produced script). Missing deliverables score 0, never crash.

Live results so far

Honest numbers from real agent runs on the bundled bench:

Setup Baseline (S₀) What happened
deepseek-v4-flash, 15 turns 1.0 Algorithm 1 early-stop — nothing to evolve
deepseek-v4-flash, 8 turns 1.0 same
deepseek-v4-flash, forced 1.0 proposer created spec_literal_transform → R_val=1.0, not > R_best → rejected
deepseek-v4-flash, forced 1.0 maintainer distilled 4 pattern pages (incl. execute_code blocked in sandbox, ripgrep binary misses); proposer created exact-match-sandbox-task → R_val=0.8889 (skill hurt) → rejected
gemma-3-4b (free, OpenRouter) — invalid run, thrown out — dead agent sessions were phantom-graded against stale sandboxes. The maintainer's pattern page caught the framework's own bug; fixed + regression-tested (see docs/RUNS.md Run 4)
gemini-2.5-flash-lite (free, OpenRouter), 8 turns 0.6667 (real) small model fails at S₀ → maintainer distilled 5 patterns → proposer created find-secret → R_val=0.4444, the skill hurt (2 regressions) → rejected. Full loop live on a genuinely weak model, ~$0.09/iteration
gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 3 iterations (issue #5) 0.4444 (real) compounding run: train as low as 0.2308, 6/48 launch failures (detected + honest 0.0s), maintainer distilled 1 pattern, proposer declined (no_action) — nothing to gate, r_best preserved. Honest negative: accumulation needs a stronger model (see docs/RUNS.md Run 6)

The gating mechanism has caught both a neutral and a harmful proposal live. Full logs in docs/RUNS.md.

Design decisions worth knowing

How this compares to other community implementations

We audited the three repos that appeared alongside the paper (see docs/RUNS.md). This is the only one that: runs on a real agent stack (Hermes), gates skills through a fully isolated profile, ships verbatim Appendix E prompts, and has a live-verified end-to-end loop (maintainer → proposer → gate → rollback).

Agent backends

The loop runs on any supported agent CLI — the raw/wiki/skill layers are backend-agnostic (issue #13).

Backend Pin a workspace Notes
hermes (default) wikiskill init demo --backend hermes reference implementation; isolated HERMES_HOME per workspace
claude wikiskill init demo --backend claude Claude Code 2.x (claude -p), isolated CLAUDE_CONFIG_DIR, transcripts normalized from the stream-json output; claude auth login required once
codex wikiskill init demo --backend codex OpenAI Codex (codex exec --json --full-auto), isolated CODEX_HOME, transcripts from session JSONL; codex login once + binary on PATH
copilot wikiskill init demo --backend copilot GitHub Copilot CLI (copilot -p -s), isolated COPILOT_HOME, skills symlinked into the sandbox's .github/skills/; copilot login once (or GH_TOKEN)

Each workspace pins its backend in workspaces/<domain>/workspace.json; switch anytime with wikiskill evolve <domain> --backend claude. Skills evolved on one backend transfer to another via wikiskill transfer (same SKILL.md format).

Skills tap — install the distilled patterns in Hermes

This repo doubles as a Hermes skills tap — the patterns distilled from live evolution runs, installable in Hermes:

hermes skills tap add ashutoshsinghpr7/wikiskill
hermes skills install ashutoshsinghpr7/wikiskill/skills/wikiskill-evolve
hermes skills install ashutoshsinghpr7/wikiskill/skills/search-miss-binary
# ...one `install` per skill you want
Skill What it teaches Paper layer
wikiskill-evolve Run the full evolution loop from inside Hermes framework meta-skill (tooling doc, not a paper artifact)
search-miss-binary ripgrep silently skips binary files — verify empty results maintainer wiki pattern (distilled from live run)
script-exec-blocked Sandbox approval policy: use file tools, not python3 -c maintainer wiki pattern
spec-literal-execution Apply only the spec's literal clauses — no hidden transforms maintainer wiki pattern
trace-harness-launch-failure Empty traces = launch failure, not agent behavior maintainer wiki pattern
verify-output-readback Re-read the deliverable before finishing maintainer wiki pattern

Paper alignment, stated honestly: the five operational skills are the maintainer's distilled patterns from real graded runs (docs/RUNS.md) — the paper's wiki layer. None has been accepted by the validation gate yet (every live gate so far was a rejection or no_action), so treat them as well-evidenced raw material for the proposer/gate pipeline, not as gate-approved skills. All ship as standard SKILL.md (agentskills.io-compatible).

Roadmap

Done:

Planned:

License

MIT — see LICENSE. Based on arXiv:2608.27454 (Google Research); all prompts in skills/ are adapted from the paper's Appendix E. Inspired by Karpathy's LLM Wiki.

wikiskill (ashutoshsinghpr7/wikiskill)

pypi
Searching Database…

What is this?WikiSkill is a faithful implementation of a Google Research paper (arXiv:2608.27454) that lets an AI agent build a persistent knowledge wiki from its own execution traces and use it to propose and validate changes to its own skill files, so lessons from failed runs survive instead of dying with the session.
Is this a simulator or does it run real agent turns?It is a Python CLI (`wikiskill`) that orchestrates genuine agent CLI turns — every inference, wiki-maintenance and skill-proposal step is a real call to Hermes Agent, Claude Code, Codex or GitHub Copilot CLI, not a mocked simulation.
How do I get it running?Install it from source with `pip install -e .`, which gives you the `wikiskill` CLI; then run `wikiskill init --backend ` to create a workspace with a demo bench and start the evolution loop with `wikiskill evolve --iters N`.
Which agent backends does it support and do I need to log into them first?The reference backend is Hermes Agent, with Claude Code, OpenAI Codex and GitHub Copilot CLI also supported (OpenCode is planned); each non-Hermes backend needs a one-time login, e.g. `claude auth login` for Claude Code, `codex login` for Codex, and `copilot login` (or a GH_TOKEN) for Copilot CLI.
Has the skill evolution loop actually produced an accepted skill yet?Not yet — every live gating run so far has ended in rejection or 'no action', so the six bundled distilled skills are honest raw material for the pipeline, not gate-approved improvements.
How does the gating mechanism decide whether to keep a proposed skill change?A candidate skill is validated on held-out tasks and kept only if its score is strictly better than the best score so far (Rval > Rbest); otherwise the skill change is rolled back with `git reset --hard`, while the wiki itself is never rolled back.
How do I plug in my own tasks?Tasks are plain JSON entries in tasks.json graded automatically with exact, contains, jsonfield or codestdout graders, so any auto-gradable workflow can be added as a benchmark.
What is the 'skills tap' feature?The repo also works as a Hermes skills tap, shipping six SKILL.md packages distilled from real evolution runs (like search-miss-binary and script-exec-blocked) that you can install directly, in agentskills.io-compatible format.
Can skills evolved on one agent backend be used on another?Yes — `wikiskill transfer` moves skills between workspaces/backends since they all share the same SKILL.md format, letting you evolve on one agent and deploy on another.
Size
0.4 MB
Stars
277
Age
1mo
Commits · 90 Days