ARS-Codex
Languages: English · 简体中文 · 繁體中文 · 日本語
ARS-Codex is the Codex-native sibling of
Academic Research Skills (ARS) for Claude Code.
It is a separate Codex distribution with its own plugin identity, packaging,
versioning, and runtime adapter.
This repository vendors the ARS workflow content as a single Codex skill:
skills/academic-research-suite/
SKILL.md
manifest.json
agents/openai.yaml
codex/
full-runtime-manifest.json
agents/
hooks/
scripts/
ars/
deep-research/
academic-paper/
academic-paper-reviewer/
academic-pipeline/
experiment-agent/
commands/
hooks/
docs/
tests/
shared/
The original Claude Code ARS checkout is not modified. Upstream content is copied
from fresh GitHub clones and adapted through the Codex router in
skills/academic-research-suite/SKILL.md.
Relationship to Claude Code ARS
This repository is ARS-Codex. For the original Claude Code ARS distribution, use
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills.
Use the Claude Code repo when you want the native Claude Code skill layout,
Claude-specific agent-team behavior, or the original ARS development history.
Use this repo when you want the Codex-native single-suite skill.
Versioning
This ARS-Codex package is version 0.1.28. The repo-root VERSION file,
skills/academic-research-suite/SKILL.md metadata version, and
skills/academic-research-suite/manifest.json adapter_version track the
Codex package version independently of the vendored ARS suite. Vendored upstream
versions are recorded by commit in manifest.source_repositories[].
Package-level changes are summarized in CHANGELOG.md.
The vendored ARS source currently tracks upstream main after the signed
v3.21.1 release at
Imbad0202/academic-research-skills@94436237913091d4739870159d241660527e8338
(2026-09-02; upstream suite metadata remains 3.21.1). This post-release
snapshot adds Chinese-aware title matching and balanced CJK wrapper handling,
declares the Markdown parser dependency used by surface-form checks, makes a
missing PyYAML dependency fail visibly, and carries the September
harness-retirement audit plus documentation corrections. The v3.21.1
research-workflow, inquiry-ledger, promotion-bakeoff, review-criteria, and
consent boundaries remain unchanged.
Nested upstream .github/ workflows and root agents/ mirrors are preserved
for traceability and self-tests, but are not repo-level CI or Codex entrypoints;
Claude/plugin loader files under .claude/ and .claude-plugin/ remain
intentionally excluded.
Install ARS-Codex Plugin
Add the GitHub marketplace and install ARS-Codex with Codex CLI:
codex plugin marketplace add Imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex --ref main
codex plugin add ars-codex@ars-codex
To update a plugin install later:
codex plugin marketplace upgrade ars-codex
codex plugin add ars-codex@ars-codex
In Codex Desktop, you can alternatively add the repository from Plugins and
then install ARS-Codex:
Marketplace source: https://github.com/Imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex.git
Branch/ref: main
Plugin: ars-codex
The plugin root is plugins/ars-codex/. Its skills/ directory contains a
materialized copy of academic-research-suite, not a symlink. This keeps
Codex Desktop installs portable on Windows, where plugin caches may materialize
symlinks as plain text files and skip bundled skill registration.
Open a new Codex conversation after installation, then invoke
$academic-research-suite or describe an academic research task that matches
the bundled workflow.
Direct Skill Install Or Update
As an alternative to the plugin, install the skill directly from this repo
path. Use --method git so public and
credentialed GitHub access both work consistently:
python3 "$HOME/.codex/skills/.system/skill-installer/scripts/install-skill-from-github.py" \
--repo Imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex \
--ref main \
--path skills/academic-research-suite \
--method git
On macOS and many Linux systems, Python 3 is exposed as python3 rather than
python. If your system only has a python command and it is Python 3, use
python in the commands instead.
To update an existing install:
rm -rf "$HOME/.codex/skills/academic-research-suite"
python3 "$HOME/.codex/skills/.system/skill-installer/scripts/install-skill-from-github.py" \
--repo Imbad0202/academic-research-skills-codex \
--ref main \
--path skills/academic-research-suite \
--method git
Open a new Codex conversation after installation. Existing Codex sessions may
keep their old skill cache; you do not need to close unrelated Claude or Codex
sessions.
Verify with /skills: you should see one ARS-Codex entry,
academic-research-suite or ARS-Codex. You should not see separate academic-paper,
academic-pipeline, deep-research, or academic-paper-reviewer skills from
this package. If you do, reinstall with the update command above and open a new
Codex conversation.
Codex Docs
- Codex setup covers
installation,
ars-* aliases, optional tools, Material Passport adapters,
and unsupported Claude plugin features.
- Codex architecture
explains the logical ARS pipeline with the Codex runtime overlay.
- Optional full-runtime adapter documents the
disabled-by-default planner, Codex agent-team templates, and hook pack.
Usage
Invoke the suite explicitly with $academic-research-suite (singular), then
describe the research task and provide any source files, notes, draft text,
reviewer comments, or output constraints.
Use $academic-research-suite to help me plan a systematic literature review on
AI adoption in higher education quality assurance.
The Codex adapter routes the request to one of five ARS workflows:
| Workflow |
Use when you need |
Example prompt |
deep-research |
Research question refinement, literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, fact-checking |
Use $academic-research-suite to build a systematic review protocol for AI in higher education QA. |
academic-paper |
Paper outline, drafting, abstract, revision, citation formatting, AI disclosure |
Use $academic-research-suite to turn these notes into an IMRaD paper outline and drafting plan. |
academic-paper-reviewer |
Manuscript review, simulated peer review, editorial decision, re-review |
Use $academic-research-suite to review this manuscript and produce a journal-style decision letter. |
academic-pipeline |
End-to-end research-to-paper workflow with integrity gates, review, revision, and final checks |
Use $academic-research-suite to run an end-to-end research-to-paper pipeline from topic to revised manuscript. |
experiment-agent |
Code experiment planning, human study protocol, statistical interpretation, reproducibility validation |
Use $academic-research-suite to plan a code experiment and define reproducibility checks. |
Claude-Style Aliases
Claude Code v3.7 installs /ars-* slash commands. Codex does not have the same
plugin command registry, so this package emulates the command intent inside the
single $academic-research-suite skill. Use either form:
Use $academic-research-suite: ars-plan my paper on AI governance in universities.
or, when your Codex client passes slash-prefixed text through as a normal user
message:
/ars-plan my paper on AI governance in universities.
If slash input is intercepted by the client, use the plain alias form:
ars-plan my paper on AI governance in universities.
| Claude command |
Codex alias |
Routed workflow |
/ars-plan |
ars-plan |
academic-paper plan mode |
/ars-outline |
ars-outline |
academic-paper outline-only mode |
/ars-abstract |
ars-abstract |
academic-paper abstract-only mode |
/ars-lit-review |
ars-lit-review |
academic-paper lit-review mode |
/ars-citation-check |
ars-citation-check |
academic-paper citation-check mode |
/ars-disclosure |
ars-disclosure |
academic-paper disclosure mode |
/ars-format-convert |
ars-format-convert |
academic-paper format-convert mode |
/ars-revision-coach |
ars-revision-coach |
academic-paper revision-coach mode |
/ars-revision |
ars-revision |
academic-paper revision mode |
/ars-reviewer |
ars-reviewer |
academic-paper-reviewer full mode |
/ars-mark-read |
ars-mark-read |
Human-read signal for citation keys in the active Material Passport |
/ars-unmark-read |
ars-unmark-read |
Rescind a prior human-read signal |
/ars-cache-invalidate |
ars-cache-invalidate |
Invalidate cached verification entries for one citation key |
/ars-full |
ars-full |
academic-pipeline full workflow |
Working Pattern
For best results, start with the workflow goal and the current state of your
materials:
Use $academic-research-suite.
Goal: write a journal article.
Current materials: I have a literature matrix and rough findings, but no outline.
Output needed now: paper architecture and missing-evidence checklist.
Constraints: English, APA 7, higher education policy audience.
If you only have a paper topic or broad research direction and do not yet have a
clear research question, the Codex router should start with ARS Socratic
scoping:
Use $academic-research-suite.
I want to write a paper on AI adoption in higher education quality assurance.
I do not yet have a clear research question.
Please use SCR / Socratic dialogue to help me narrow the question first; do not write an outline yet.
Expected route: deep-research socratic mode first. ARS should ask narrowing
questions and should not produce an outline or draft until the research question
has converged.
For review tasks, provide the manuscript or a path to the manuscript, plus the
review mode you want:
Use $academic-research-suite to review this paper.
Mode: full review.
Focus: methodology, contribution, citation integrity, and likely desk-reject risks.
Output: reviewer reports plus editorial decision letter.
For staged pipelines, ask for a checkpoint instead of asking Codex to run the
entire process silently:
Use $academic-research-suite to start an academic-pipeline run.
Begin with Stage 0 intake and stop after producing the pipeline dashboard.
Smoke Tests
In a new Codex conversation:
/skills
Expected: one ARS entry only.
Then test Socratic routing:
Use $academic-research-suite.
I want to write a paper on AI adoption in higher education quality assurance.
I do not yet have a clear research question.
Expected: route to deep-research socratic mode and ask narrowing questions.
CLI smoke test:
codex exec --ephemeral --sandbox read-only \
-C /path/to/academic-research-skills-codex \
'Use $academic-research-suite. Router smoke test only. User request to classify: I want to write a paper on AI adoption in higher education quality assurance, but I do not yet have a clear research question. According to the academic-research-suite router, classify the workflow and mode.'
Maintainer quality gates:
python3 skills/academic-research-suite/codex/scripts/ars_codex_quality_gates.py all --json
Expected: every reported gate has "ok": true.
Non-Blocking Codex Warnings
These Codex messages do not mean ARS failed to install:
[features].codex_hooks is deprecated — update your Codex config when
convenient; ARS-Codex does not require hooks for normal use.hooks need review before they can run — review those hooks separately if
you use them. ARS-Codex treats vendored Claude hooks as traceability metadata
and does not require them.
Codex Adapter Behavior
ARS was originally written for Claude Code. In this Codex package:
- The vendored
agents/*.md files are used as role and phase prompts.
- The Codex-only
codex/ directory contains an optional full-runtime adapter
profile. It is disabled by default and does not change normal inline routing.
- The vendored
commands/ars-*.md files are prompt recipes only. Codex does not
register them as slash commands.
- The vendored
hooks/hooks.json file is preserved for upstream traceability
only. Codex does not install Claude Code hooks from this package.
- Codex does not automatically spawn background agents unless you explicitly ask
for delegated or parallel agent work.
- Web/source verification uses Codex browsing and must cite sources when current
or external facts matter.
- Cross-model verification is disabled by default. When explicitly requested in
this Codex package, follow the vendored provider setup in
ars/shared/cross_model_verification.md, identify the provider/model/content
class first, and obtain explicit user consent before any external upload.
External reviewers are called through configured provider APIs, not simulated
through the active Codex model.
ARS_MODEL_TIERING is unset by default. The Codex adapter preserves the
upstream judgment/execution classification but applies economy or
quality-boost only when the runtime supports an explicit per-dispatch model
override; otherwise it reports a no-op and keeps the active model.- Protected top-level agent
tools: allowlists remain least-privilege role
boundaries. A dispatched checkpoint owner does not gain Bash or network
transport; the dispatching Codex context owns any explicitly consented
cross-model call.
- A
[CROSS-MODEL-HANDOFF v1] block is a transport request, not a deliverable.
The dispatcher validates it, sends only its payload, applies the mechanical
result routing, and returns judgment work to the original owner.
- In reviewer
full mode, an explicitly configured and consented cross-model
run swaps the existing Reviewer 2 seat; it never adds a sixth reviewer.
Re-review applies the separate Priority-1 judge pass and records provenance.
Single-family execution and provider fallback are disclosed.
ARS_CACHE_STALE_ADVISORY_DAYS controls the advisory-only cache-age threshold,
while ARS_CACHE_REVALIDATE=1 opts into live bibliographic re-validation.
These settings apply when the programmatic citation gate is run; stale rows
alone never fail an integrity gate.- Locally read PDFs run the structural
pdf_read_preflight.py by default before
page anchors are trusted. FAIL and UNAVAILABLE remain distinct, and a
missing parser or sidecar is never treated as PASS. The v3.20 sandboxed
content classifier is an explicit opt-in advisory and cannot override this
structural preflight.
ars-mark-read requires a user-declared read_scope for every new mark.
Explicit unknown and legacy scope-less records remain coverage_unknown;
partial coverage stays visible and Codex never infers full-text reading.- Revision rounds use the v3.20 evidence-bound, non-ranking roadmap and explicit
author-adjudication contract. They also preserve the v3.19-introduced
claim-strength ladder and deterministic numeric, citation, marker, and
protected-term conservation checks as advisory-first guards.
- The upstream v3.18 SessionStart update checker is vendored but not installed
or executed as a Codex hook. Plugin users update with
codex plugin marketplace upgrade ars-codex followed by
codex plugin add ars-codex@ars-codex; direct skill installs still update by
reinstalling or pulling this repository.
- Upstream references to a "fresh Claude Code session" mean a new Codex
conversation in this package; Material Passport reset semantics still apply.
- If a citation, source, statistic, or journal policy cannot be verified, Codex
should mark it as unverified rather than invent support.
ARS post-v3.21.1 Main Parity
This package aims for the same user-facing workflow content as upstream ARS
post-v3.21.1 main at
94436237913091d4739870159d241660527e8338 where Codex has an equivalent
concept. Upstream suite metadata remains 3.21.1.
Bibliographic network behavior is intentionally explicit at the Codex adapter
boundary:
| Research path |
Default Codex behavior |
Dedicated API/client trigger |
| Ordinary topic or candidate discovery |
Codex browsing and authoritative web sources |
The four Python resolver clients are not launched |
| Prompt-level ingest, deduplication, or source verification |
Codex browsing or official metadata pages |
“Automatic” lookup wording in vendored prompts does not launch a Python client |
| Script-backed citation-existence gate |
Not implied by ars-full; Stage 2.5/4.5 still run as integrity checkpoints through the default Codex route |
Explicit programmatic-verification request; then Crossref/OpenAlex/Semantic Scholar run for non-manual references and arXiv only when arxiv_id exists, subject to cache behavior |
| Claim-standing discovery |
Advisory offer after an eligible Stage 2.5/4.5 Claim Registry row |
Separate user request plus affirmative plan-bound consent; uses v3.21 discovery adapters, not the single-reference resolver clients |
| Contamination backfill or migration |
Never automatic |
Explicit migration CLI only |
| Upstream ARS feature |
Codex package behavior |
| One installable plugin |
Native Codex plugin ars-codex, bundling the single academic-research-suite skill |
/ars-* slash commands |
Emulated as ars-* aliases through the skill router; not native slash commands |
Four upstream skills auto-discovered from skills/ symlinks |
Single Codex router skill selects the workflow and reads the vendored workflow WORKFLOW.md files |
| Plugin-shipped agents |
Agent files are role/phase prompts; Codex runs them inline unless the user explicitly asks for delegated subagents |
| Optional Codex full-runtime profile |
Planner, agent-team templates, and hook pack live under skills/academic-research-suite/codex/; disabled by default |
Heavy commands (ars-full, ars-reviewer, ars-revision-coach) omit model:; light modes retain model: sonnet |
Heavy commands inherit the current Codex session model; light-mode sonnet remains upstream Claude metadata and does not override the session model |
ARS_MODEL_TIERING=economy|quality-boost |
Classification is preserved; routing remains advisory unless Codex exposes per-dispatch model selection |
Protected agent tools: allowlists |
Preserved as least-privilege role boundaries; dispatched owners do not receive Bash/network transport |
| Canonical cross-model handoff envelope |
Dispatcher validates the envelope, transports only the payload after consent, and follows the closed result-routing contract |
| Contained Codex citation transport |
Opt-in, consent-gated transport is limited to narrow citation-integrity checks; it is inactive unless explicitly configured and requested |
| Evidence-bound review and revision |
Durable evidence rows, confirmed review criteria, non-ranking roadmaps, author adjudication, and revision-evidence bundles are preserved |
| Research-workflow profiles |
Default-off deterministic selection with a visible field-general fallback; no research family is inferred from manuscript |
ARS-Codex 是学术研究技能套件（Academic Research Skills，ARS）的 Codex 原生移植版，是一个打包好的 Codex 技能/插件，可协助完成需要人工参与的学术研究工作流程，例如文献综述、论文起草、模拟同行评审，以及端到端的研究流程。